This project is read-only.


Bad Assembly binding version in web.config for NH ?


I don't understand the NH version in lib, is it or ???

It has been upgraded and patch to,

this is the fileversion appearing in windows properties,

but vs2012 sees it as a ???
Should we upgrade assembly binding, is there some pb in assembly version number ?
Closed Dec 3, 2013 at 8:39 PM by sebastienros


sebastienros wrote Jul 23, 2013 at 3:21 PM

NH doesn't always update the assembly version even if the file version has changed. I will check.

CSADNT wrote Jul 23, 2013 at 4:18 PM

In the actual state the version is the same, and changing assembly binding is NOK.
But code has chnage and assembly version not ? This could lead to problems from the old dllhell times ?

Jetski5822 wrote Jul 24, 2013 at 9:57 AM

In this instance there shouldn't be any issues from the old dll. They are binary compatible if you are thinking that might be an issue.

CSADNT wrote Jul 24, 2013 at 1:28 PM

Ok, thanks for follow up, but I am still puzzled by the fact that NH generates assemblies with different internal code and same version, even if file version is different.
That's not the proof of a great quality.

BertrandLeRoy wrote Jul 25, 2013 at 8:39 PM

You may want to file a bug against them, then. We're not going to comment on the quality of their code, but you are free to do so...

CSADNT wrote Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 PM

That's not m'y question, I simply raise a warning when I see a configuration which is well known to have been at the origin of many problems...
you don't fond This strange ? Different code, same version ?

BertrandLeRoy wrote Jul 25, 2013 at 11:59 PM

Not sure what your question is. I do think a different version should have a different version number, but we are in no position to impose that on them. They are a separate project. I don't see any problem with it however if it's not in the GAC.