8

Closed

Drop support for ASPX

description

It's fairly safe to say that there is no code in core or in community modules using ASPX. Everything is now using CSHTML/Razor. Support for multiple view engines is cool in principle but in practice is used by nobody.
We could maintain the possibility in place, but configure the site by default to only look for cshtml.
This may actually speed up things a bit.
Closed Aug 5, 2013 at 1:19 AM by BertrandLeRoy
as requested

comments

AimOrchard wrote Nov 27, 2012 at 10:31 AM

Wouldn't it be sufficient to make WebFormViewEngineProvider a separate feature and enable/disable it when needed?

infofromca wrote Nov 27, 2012 at 10:16 PM

there is still code to deal with feature,so just drop it

erik_oppedijk wrote Aug 4, 2013 at 7:45 PM

Was done in 200c7f6e5965 I guess, so close this one