Oct 19, 2012 at 9:07 AM
Edited Oct 19, 2012 at 9:33 AM
A few missing things which we hopefully can implement in V1.7 and a futher disccusion of issue: http://orchard.codeplex.com/workitem/18746
Currently we're are still using Umbraco for 99% of our sites (unfortunately, because I really don't like it. I'm preferring Orchard way more in almost every way!
I'm using Orchard since the beginning (a few years now) but I still can't convince our 'bosses' to make a move to Orchard because of the following points. Pure by features and archtitecture it's a piece of cake to convince them though.
Hereby the 2 main issues for them with Orchard:
- We have sites with contenttypes/ documenttypes with a lot properties/fields and parts. In Orchard it's not yet possible to split fields and parts/shapes between tabs. (only from controller actions)
- The tree module of bertrandleroy is a good start bug not nicely integrated like we talked about in the last meeting. I don't say a tree is the right solution but it would be
nice if you can create sub folders and view the in a integrated way (taxonomies?).
An example which currently can't be done nice for content editors (non technical people) of one of our customers:
Every tabs in the screenshot has a about the amount of properties as the first tab
I would really like to help with these points so maybe would could discuss this topic also at the next meeting.